|
samedi 13 juin 2015
De la part de nos amis argentins
samedi 30 mai 2015
A molecular gastronomy seminar in New York
Dear all
this is from our friends in NYC:
this is from our friends in NYC:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||
mercredi 22 avril 2015
Molecular Gastronomy in NYC
Hello all,
The April meeting of the Experimental Cuisine Collective will take place on Tuesday, April 28 from 4 to 6 p.m. in the Chemistry Department at NYU, room 1003 (31 Washington Place, between Washington Square Park and Greene Street). You will need a photo ID to enter the building.
Mark Bomford, the director of the Yale Sustainability Project and a member of the advisory board for the Nordic Food Lab's three-year research project that explores the deliciousness of insects, and Greg Sewitz and Gabi Lewis of Exo, which is pioneering the consumption of insects as a nutritious and sustainable protein source and has been featured in all leading national media since launching in 2014, will discuss the consumption of insects from cultural, sustainable, and entrepreneurial perspectives.
The session will begin with an overall perspective on cultural/anthropological and culinary perceptions around insects and talk about their role in taking more sustainable approaches for our food system: Insects are abundant on every continent, nutritious, and delicious. But why are they such a small component of human diets? The publication of an FAO report in 2013 was a watershed moment for entomophagy, and coincided with a flurry of research, development, entrepreneurship, and journalistic attention. How do we assess claims regarding the environmental superiority of insects? And what might the impact of widespread insect-eating be upon land, water, biodiversity, and climate? And then will examine those questions from an entrepreneurial perspective: Why we should consume insects, in what forms, what future the "insect industry" holds, and much more.
Please RSVP at ecc042015.eventbrite.com. A link is also posted on our website. If you RSVP and can no longer make it, please let me know right away so that your seat can be released---thank you!
All my best,
Anne
----
Anne E. McBride
Director, Experimental Cuisine Collective
ABOUT THE EXPERIMENTAL CUISINE COLLECTIVE
The Experimental Cuisine Collective is a working group that assembles scholars, scientists, chefs, writers, journalists, performance artists, and food enthusiasts. We launched in April 2007, as a result of the collaboration of Kent Kirshenbaum of the chemistry department and Amy Bentley of the nutrition, food studies, and public health department at New York University with Chef Will Goldfarb of WillPowder. Our overall aim is to develop a broad-based and rigorous academic approach that employs techniques and approaches from both the humanities and sciences to examine the properties, boundaries, and conventions of food.
Visit the ECC online at www.experimentalcuisine.com.
lundi 23 mars 2015
From our friends in NYC, USA
|
||
|
jeudi 12 février 2015
A seminar in NYC
From Anne McBribe, in New York :
Hello all,
Sorry for the lag in between meetings this year---it's been a busy period for us. Amy Bentley's new book,
Inventing
Baby Food (not an affiliate link so click in
peace), was released this past fall, and I have one coming out in a few
months. But we look forward to seeing you this spring, starting with our February meeting, which will take place
Monday, February 23, from 4:30 to 6:30 p.m. (note the time)
in the
Chemistry Department at NYU, room 1003 (31 Washington Place, between
Washington Square Park and Greene Street). You will need a photo ID to
enter the building.
Lee DeHaan has been a plant breeder at The Land
Institute since 2001. Raised on a farm in Minnesota, he has a strong
background in the everyday challenges of agriculture. His focus is
development of Kernza (wheatgrass) as a perennial grain. Lee
earned a B.A. in Plant Science and Biology at Dordt College, and M.S
and Ph.D. degrees in Agronomy, specializing in Agro-ecology, at the
University of Minnesota.
Please RSVP at ecc022015.eventbrite.com. A link is also posted on our website. If you RSVP and can no longer make it, please let me know right away so that your seat can be released---thank you!
All my best,
Anne
----
Anne E. McBride
Director, Experimental Cuisine Collective
lundi 20 octobre 2014
In NYC
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||
vendredi 17 octobre 2014
Computers !
Which technology helped me most? Computers !
Indeed, in order to understand the answer, we have to consider the job that I am doing. All lies in the "scientific method", which consists in :
1- identification of a particular phenomenon
2- quantitative determination of the phenomenon
3- grouping the data into synthetic laws
4- inducing theory
5- looking for a testable consequence of the theory
6-testing the consequence experimentally
Of course, I don't need technology for the first step: here I just need to speak to cooks (sorry, I don't call them chefs, because they are not my boss and I hate this power relationship in the culinary circles).
Then, for the quantitative determination of the phenomena, the "characterisation", we use such machines such as NMR, GC-MS, etc. In the old times, analysis was very cumbersome, and for example, with the first machines, with paper printed after the electronics, we had to cut the signals with cissors before weighing the paper in order to get a value of the area under the signal.
But here, one parenthesis. I answered "computers", but indeed I teach that there are 3 big ideas for science and technology :
- use a balance
- always try to find a resonance if you want to make something precise (and here electronics becomes important, not only computers)
- use the "method of zero", and here electronics also is useful.
But let's come back to number 2: thanks to computers, we avoid plotting, and we can calculate with signals. Indeed the sole software (almost) in my computer is Maple, a wonderful software because it allows to make formal calculations as you would do with pencil and paper, but cleaner, more easily, etc.
Number 3: again computers are important, because you have to manipulate data. And here I remember that I have to explain why computers are important for calculation. When the trajectory of the moon was calculated by Delaunay, about one century ago (I should check this), the calculation was many months long! Pages and pages. Today, you just press the "enter" button, and it's done.
Number 4 : here we have to create a "discourse" by induction, we have to dream, to think, to invent... and as it's natural language, computers (and word processing softwares are so wonderful). Remember(you were not born;-) ) the time when you had to write with pencil and paper, or the time when you used typemachines! For my first book (a textbook for mathematics), I dropped hundreds of papers sheets in order to get a clean manuscript. Sure, I am not very smart, but anyway, it's a fact, and today, I am so happy to be able to use the return key in order to erase what I don't like, what is not right!
Number 5 : this is again calculation, and again Maple.
Number 6: and we come back to experiment, and analysis, and electronics.
Indeed, in order to understand the answer, we have to consider the job that I am doing. All lies in the "scientific method", which consists in :
1- identification of a particular phenomenon
2- quantitative determination of the phenomenon
3- grouping the data into synthetic laws
4- inducing theory
5- looking for a testable consequence of the theory
6-testing the consequence experimentally
Of course, I don't need technology for the first step: here I just need to speak to cooks (sorry, I don't call them chefs, because they are not my boss and I hate this power relationship in the culinary circles).
Then, for the quantitative determination of the phenomena, the "characterisation", we use such machines such as NMR, GC-MS, etc. In the old times, analysis was very cumbersome, and for example, with the first machines, with paper printed after the electronics, we had to cut the signals with cissors before weighing the paper in order to get a value of the area under the signal.
But here, one parenthesis. I answered "computers", but indeed I teach that there are 3 big ideas for science and technology :
- use a balance
- always try to find a resonance if you want to make something precise (and here electronics becomes important, not only computers)
- use the "method of zero", and here electronics also is useful.
But let's come back to number 2: thanks to computers, we avoid plotting, and we can calculate with signals. Indeed the sole software (almost) in my computer is Maple, a wonderful software because it allows to make formal calculations as you would do with pencil and paper, but cleaner, more easily, etc.
Number 3: again computers are important, because you have to manipulate data. And here I remember that I have to explain why computers are important for calculation. When the trajectory of the moon was calculated by Delaunay, about one century ago (I should check this), the calculation was many months long! Pages and pages. Today, you just press the "enter" button, and it's done.
Number 4 : here we have to create a "discourse" by induction, we have to dream, to think, to invent... and as it's natural language, computers (and word processing softwares are so wonderful). Remember(you were not born;-) ) the time when you had to write with pencil and paper, or the time when you used typemachines! For my first book (a textbook for mathematics), I dropped hundreds of papers sheets in order to get a clean manuscript. Sure, I am not very smart, but anyway, it's a fact, and today, I am so happy to be able to use the return key in order to erase what I don't like, what is not right!
Number 5 : this is again calculation, and again Maple.
Number 6: and we come back to experiment, and analysis, and electronics.
Inscription à :
Articles (Atom)